Stabilisation policy, rational expectations and price-level versus ination targeting: a survey
نویسندگان
چکیده
We survey literature comparing ination targeting (IT) and price-level targeting (PT) as macroeconomic stabilisation policies. Our focus is on New Keynesian models and areas that have seen signi cant developments since Amblers (2009) survey: optimal monetary policy; the zero lower bound; nancial frictions; and transition costs of adopting a PT regime. Amblers conclusion that PT improves social welfare in New Keynesian models is fairly robust, but we note an interesting split in the literature: PT consistently outperforms IT in models where policymakers commit to simple Taylor-type rules, but results in favour of PT when policymakers minimise loss functions are overturned with small deviations from the baseline model. Since the bene cial e¤ects of PT appear to hang on the joint assumption that agents are rational and the economy New Keynesian, we discuss survey and experimental evidence on rational expectations and the applied macro literature on the empirical performance of New Keynesian models. Overall, the evidence is not clear-cut, but we note that New Keynesian models can pass formal statistical tests against macro data and that models with rational expectations outperform those with behavioural expectations (i.e. heuristics) in direct statistical tests. We therefore argue that policymakers should continue to pay attention to
منابع مشابه
Price level targeting with strategic fiscal policy and the value of fiscal leadership
This paper investigate the stabilization bias that arises in a model of non-cooperative monetary and fiscal policy stabilisation of the economy, when monetary authority implements price level targeting but fiscal policy remains benevolent. We demonstrate the gain in welfare improvement depends on the level of steady state debt. If the steady state level of the government debt is low, then the m...
متن کاملPrice Level Targeting vs. Ination Targeting: A Free Lunch?
Price level targeting (without base drift) and ination targeting (with base drift) are compared with persistence in output (generated by sticky prices, for instance). Counter to conventional wisdom, price level targeting results in lower short-run ination variability than ination targeting (if output is at least moderately persistent). Price level targeting also eliminates any average inati...
متن کاملAdaptive Learning and the Use of Forecasts in Monetary Policy
This paper investigates monetary policy design when central bank and private sector expectations di¤er. Private agents learn adaptively; the central bank has a possibly misspeci ed model of the economy. Successful implementation of optimal policy using ination targeting rules requires the central bank to have complete knowledge of private agentslearning behavior. If the central bank mistakenl...
متن کاملPrice-Level Targeting and Risk Management in a Low-Inflation Economy
With inflation and policy interest rates at historically low levels, policymakers show great concern about "downside tail risks" due to a zero lower bound on nominal interest rates. Low probability or tail events, such as sustained deflation or recession, are disruptive for the economy and can be difficult to resolve. This paper shows that price-level targeting mitigates downside tail risks res...
متن کاملMonetary Policy Delegation and Equilibrium Coordination
This paper revisits the argument that the stabilisation bias that arises under discretionary monetary policy can be reduced if policy is delegated to a policymaker with redesigned objectives. We study four delegation schemes: price level targeting, interest rate smoothing, speed limits and straight conservatism. These can all increase social welfare in models with a unique discretionary equilib...
متن کامل